Lecture 11422. Art IV – Do Works of Art Always Have Meaning? (2015)(1_2) [JUNGBUB TALK]

If it is a (real) work of art, there is nothing without meaning.
But whether or not to view this as artwork depends on the other person.
The person who creates this work cannot do it.
They are just active with their talents, but to call them artists is also something for other people to judge.
No matter how much you shout that you are Seuseung, you cannot become a Seuseung.
Seuseung is something that the other person recognizes as Seuseung and makes it.
Then, who decided that an artist is an artist?
It’s about which class of people raised why that person as an artist.
But when people asked me, I answered that there was no artist in the world even though someone touched the art.
They just did their own activities with their own aptitudes, but why do you appreciate them as artists?
Each person has all kinds of their own talents.
We were born after World War II, and when we entered elementary school, what did we hear?
We were taught that we were all born with talents and had to develop them all.
If we talk about artists, these people are the artists.
Each person develops their talents and this becomes a work of art.
But you kept talking about art and asking me, so I accepted your thoughts at first, but now I am saying that there is no artist.
I am saying now that there were no artists, even if there were people who had been active with their talents.
Why? How would you say that there were artists in an age when knowledge was not perfect?
When your work comes out with all the equipped knowledge, you can say it is a work of art.
But knowledge had been evolving until December 21, 2012.
While it’s evolving, whom can you designate as an artist?
Your knowledge and talents were also developing, but how do you say that there were artists?
You ask me now, and I answer that artists have not yet come out according to the laws of nature and that humanity says that a specific talent is an artist.
Since you keep asking more deeply, I answer that those so-called artists died while wandering and how they were artists?
My answer is coming out now like this.
Whether you accept this or not, it doesn’t matter.
All the scientists couldn’t solve the problems, so they died while feeling stuffy.
That’s not how an artist looks like.
They just had that talent and did their activities with their talents.
From 2013 onwards, the real artist will come out.
A person who answers this is Yedoin (Doin in art).
Yedoin answers by giving proof to this.
And they will name it here.
Yedoin.
Even if they (artists) talk about all of their thoughts up to this point and explain them, they (Yedoin) say “Ummm~” and look them down.
We have received information about what humanity talked about artists and accepted and evaluated it as it was.
If you received information, you have to evaluate it.
So are you going to acknowledge these people as artists?
Or were they the people who just had tried hard with their talents in that field?
You have to talk about such things.
But if I say that, they will insult me, saying, “Isn’t that person crazy?” because they think they are right as experts and doctors.
So, I cannot speak.
I tried not to criticize them, but you kept asking me about it, so I answered that there were no artists.
How can we call them who had only that skill artists?
And they still haven’t enlightened and given an answer and have died while wandering.
Can we call musicians, who died while struggling with music, artists?
And they had a good family.
But they were not faithful to their family, then can you call them artists?
They (artists) should know how to make their family joyful and beautiful, and in the meantime, their works should also have come out.
Why do you keep saying the losers artists?
Humanity has not done anything that they haven’t failed until now.
They were running and developing, but they all failed to compare to their abilities.
So, they were wandered and died like that.
How will people accept this?

To be continued on episode 2…